Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Trade Window Sales
Sponsored by
For quality conservatories, windows & doors at affordable prices
Over 17,000 satisfied customers in the last 10 years

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

New schools an assault on the poor



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 October 2008
Last week I attended the public "consultation" meetings for the proposed academies at Intake and South Leeds High School.

Given Education Leeds's history of public consultation, I think it is now widely recognised that these meetings are nothing more than charades, in a court where Education Leeds acts as both prosecutor and jury.

But I don't think there's anything
to be gained from getting angry any more. Everyone knows that this is the case.

What is as interesting, as it is indeed dangerous, is that they get away with it. And what they are getting away with, in this case, as with the previous closure/mergers of Leeds schools in deprived areas – namely Gotts' Park, Middleton Park, Foxwood-East Leeds, Cross Green, Royal Park, Miles Hill, Asket Hill etc – is an attack on the poor, the weakest, the most vulnerable young citizens of Leeds and on their families.

These schools were, and where they still exist, are doing amazing jobs, in protecting, caring for, developing the life-skills of their charges, and doing for them what is humanly possible and useful in terms of good exam grades.

This can't be reflected in the simplistic and crass measurements that are so many GCSEs per pupil.

By this endless change and uncertainty for the inner city children central government is attacking the poor when it should be attacking poverty itself.

The government devised "academies" and gave these educational establishments this pretentious name presumably to suggest they will be somehow better than schools, maybe akin to universities. But they are no more than boot camps, where children's behaviour is strictly controlled and young people not allowed to be and to discover themselves at this vital point in their lives of self-discovery.

Academies were devised as a solution to so-called failing schools. Schools aren't failing any more, certainly Intake and South Leeds aren't, and so, in theory there should no need for them.

Pressure

So why this relentless pressure? Why not just say, Well done?

What we are witnessing is the dismantling of our public education system, and if we don't speak up, this is what are we acquiescing in.

A sense of fairness seems to have gone out of this world. "Every Child Matters" is nice little tag line, as nice as it is quite untrue.

The children who go through the changes that are these closures and mergers never recover. And nor the teaching staff who put their careers on hold to stay with children and their families in what we euphemistically call our "inner-city" areas.

Victoria Jaquiss, FRSA, Leeds teacher and school governor



The full article contains 442 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 October 2008 11:50 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Leeds
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.